|
Typically, more than 90 percent of all cancers are histologically
confirmed. Reviewing all pathology reports is essential to
complete cancer reporting. If the pathology department is
computerized and each report contains an ICD-O
histology and behavior code, a computerized list of diagnoses
with behavior codes of 2 (in-situ) and 3 (malignant, primary)
can be generated. A separate list of all diagnoses with behavior
codes of 0 (benign) and 1 (borderline and uncertain behavior)
should also be printed to allow review of these reports.
|
|
If the pathology department is not computerized
or does not use ICD-O codes to code histology, the registrar
must manually review each pathology report. Some cancer
registrars arrange with the pathology department to
automatically have copies of all pathology reports sent
to the registry for review so
|
that the registrar can determine which are reportable.
Both computerized and manual methods of reviewing pathology
reports must include a way to track reports to ensure that
each report has been included in the registrar's review. A
copy of the pathology report may not be in the file at the
time of the registrar's review; occasionally, slides are submitted
for outside consultation and review, and pathologists require
additional time to draft a final report for a pathology specimen.
An example of a pathology screening log is provided below.
Sample Pathology Screening Log
Date
of Review
12-6-2001 |
Pathology
Log #
Reviewed from
11-1-2001 |
Pathology
Log #
Reviewed to
12-2-2001 |
Missing
Pathology
Reports
01-9994
|
Person
Completing the
Review
CLH |
|
|

|